Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

ºÒ¼Ò¹æÃâ ·¹ÁøÀÇ ÇÕ¼º°ú ÃæÀüµÈ Ä¡Áú³»ÀÇ ºÒ¼Ò³óµµ º¯È­¿¡ °üÇÑ ¿¬±¸

SYNTHESIS OF FLUORIDE RELEASING RESIN AND FLUORIDE LEVEL CHANGES OF THE TOOTH STRUCTURE

´ëÇÑÄ¡°ú±âÀçÇÐȸÁö 1987³â 14±Ç 1È£ p.35 ~ 55
¹Ú¿µÁØ, ¾çÈ«¼­,
¼Ò¼Ó »ó¼¼Á¤º¸
¹Ú¿µÁØ (  ) - Àü³²´ëÇб³
¾çÈ«¼­ (  ) - Àü³²´ëÇб³ Ä¡°ú´ëÇÐ Ä¡°úÀç·áÇб³½Ç

Abstract

°á·Ð
º¹ÇÕ·¹ÁøÀº Ä¡¾Æ¿ÍÀÇ °áÇÕÀÌ ¹°¸®ÀûÀÎ °áÇÕ¿¡ ÀÇÁ¸Çϱ⠶§¹®¿¡ º¯¿¬´©Ãâ¿¡ ÀÇÇÑ ÃæÀü¹°
ÁÖÀ§ÀÇ ÀÌÂ÷ ¿ì½Ä°ú ¼öº¹ ÈÄ Ä¡¼ö°ú¹Î Çö»óÀÌ ¹ß»ýÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖ´Â Å« ´ÜÁ¡ÀÌ ÀÖ´Ù .
µÈ ¿¬±¸´Â ¿ì½Ä¿¹¹æ ´É·ÂÀÌ ÀÖ´Â ºÒ¼Ò°¡ ÃæÀü¹°·ÎºÎÅÍ Ä¡¾Æ³»·Î À¯¸®µÇ¸ç Ä¡¾Æ¿Í ·¹Áø°£
¿­ÆØâ·üÀÇ Â÷À̸¦ ÁÙÀÏ ¼ö ÀÖ´Â fpÁøÀ» Á¦ÀÛÇϱâ À§ÇØ ½ÃÇàµÇ¾ú´Ù.
ºÒ¼Ò¹æÃâ ´Ü·®Ã¼¸¦ ÇÕ¼ºÇÏ¿© Àû¿Ü¼± ºÐ±¤ºÐ¼®ÀûÀ¸·Î È®ÀÎÇÑ ÈÄ À̸¦ »ç¿ëÇÑ Ä¡°ú¿ë ·¹Áø
À» Á¦ÀÛ, Ä¡¾Æ¿¡ ÃæÀüÇÏ¿© 1°³¿ù ½Ãȿó¸® ÈÄÀÇ Ä¡Áú³» ºÒ¼Ò³óµµ º¯È­¸¦ x-¼± ±¤ÀüÀÚ ½ºÆå
Æ®·³À¸·Î ºÐ¼®ÇÏ¿´´Ù. ¶ÇÇÑ ½Ç¸®Ä« fillerÀÇ Ç¥¸éÀ» ¥ã-methacr-yloxypropyl
trimethoxysilaneÀ¸·Î ÄÚÆÃÇÏ¿© º¹ÇÕ·¹ÁøÀ» Á¦ÀÛÇÑ ÈÄ fillerÀÇ Ç¥¸éó¸® È¿°ú¸¦ ÁÖ»çÀüÀÚÇö
¹Ì°æÀ¸·Î °üÂûÇÏ¿´°í, ·¹Áø±âÁú³» ethyleneglycol dimethacrylate(EGDMA)ÀÇ ÇÔ·®À» 29%,
17% ¹× 12% ¹«°Ôºñ·Î Á¶ÀýÇÒ ¶§ °­µµ ¹× ¿­ÆØâ°è¼ö¸¦ ¸¸´É¹°¼º ½ÃÇè±â¿Í ¿­±â °èÀû ºÐ¼®
ÀåÄ¡·Î½á °üÂûÇÏ¿© ´ÙÀ½°ú °°Àº °á·ÐÀ» ¾ò¾ú´Ù.
1. t-ButylaminoethanolÀ» triethylamine Á¸ÀçÇÏ¿¡¼­ methacryloyl chloride¿Í ¹ÝÀÀ½ÃÄÑ
t-butylam-inoethyl methacrylateÃâ ÇÕ¼ºÇÏ¿´°í, ÇÕ¼ºµÈ ¹ÝÀÀ»ý¼º¹°¿¡ 50% ºÒÈ­¼ö¼Ò ¿ë¾×À»
µ¿ÀÏ mole·® Àû °¡½ÃÅ´À¸·Î½á t-butylaminoethyl methacrylate-HF salt¸¦ ÇÕ¼ºÇÏ¿´´Ù.
2. ºÒ¼Ò·¹Áø ÃæÀü¹° ÁÖº¯ Ä¡Áú³» ºÒ¼Ò³óµµ°¡ Å©°Ô Áõ°¡ÇÏ¿´°í ºÒ¼Ò·¹Áø ÃæÀü¹°·ÎºÎÅÍ ¸Õ
ºÎÀÎÀϼö·Ï ºÒ¼Ò³óµµ Áõ°¡ÀÇ ÆøÀº °¨¼ÒÇÏ¿´´Ù.
3. Siane ó¸® ÇÑ filler¸¦ »ç¿ëÇÑ ºÒ°í¹æÃâ º¹ÇÕ·¹ÁøÀÇ ÆÄÀý¸éÀÇ ÁÖ»çÀüÀÚÇö¹Ì°æ»óÀº filler
¿Í ·¹Áø±â Áú°£ÀÌ ºÐ¸®µÇÁö ¾ÊÀº »óÀ» º¸ÀÌ°í, silane 󸮰¡ ¾ÈµÈ filler¿Í ÇÔ²² Á¦ÀÛÇÑ ½ÃÆí
ÀÇ ÆÄÀý·ÃÀº filler¿Í ·¹Áø±âÁúÀÌ ºÐ¸®µÈ »óÀ» º¸¿´´Ù.
4. EGDMAÀÇ ³óµµ°¡ 12%À϶§ °¡Àå °­µµ°¡ ¿ì¼öÇÏ¿´°í(P<0.01), EGDMAÀÇ ÇÔ·®º¯È­¿Í
°­µµ°£¿¡´Â »ó°ü°ü°è°¡ ÀÖ¾ú´Ù(P<0.05)
5. EGDMAÀÇ ÇÔ·®ÀÌ Áõ°¡ÇÔ¿¡ µû¶ó ¿­ÆØâ°è¼ö´Â °¨¼ÒÇÏ¿© ±× ³óµµ°¡ 29% À϶§ Ä¡¾ÆÀÇ
¿­ÆØâ°è¼ö¿Í °¡Àå À¯»çÇÏ¿´´Ù
#ÃÊ·Ï#
Adhesion between the resin and the tooth structure depends only on the mechanical
bonding. Thus, the susceptibility of the restored tooth to the secondary caries and to the
post operative sensitivity is a significant weakpoint of the dental composite resin.
This study was undertaken to synthesize the resin that releases the anti cariogenic
fluoride and reduces the marginal leakage.
Fluoride releasing monomer was synthesized and it was identified by the infra red
spectrophotometry.
The tooth was restored with the prepared dental resin containing the synthesized
monomer. After one month's aging treatment, the changes of the fluoride concentration
in the tooth structure were analysed with x-ray photoelectron spectroscopy.
The effectiveness of the surface treatment of the filler using ¥ã-methacryloxypropyl
trimethoxysilane was evaluated with the scanning electron microscopy.
With the variation of the ethyleneglycol dimethacrylate (EGDMA) concentration in the
resin matrix phase, the strength and thermal expansion coefficient of the resins were
evaluated with the universal testing machine and the thermomechanical analyzer.
The results were as follows :
1. t-Butylaminoethyl methacrylate anion exchange resin was synthesized by the
reaction of the t-butylaminoethanol and methacryloyl chloride under the presence of the
triethylamine. Reacting of the equimolar 50% HF solution to the synthesized reaction
product produced the t-butylaminoethyl methacrylate HF salt.
2. Fluoride concentration in the tooth structure around the fluoride releasing resin
restoration was significantly increased, and the degree of the fluoride concentration
increase was decreased with the distance from the restoration.
3. The fractured surface of the fluoride releasing composite resin prepared with the
silane treated filler showed that the fillers are not separated from the resin matrix on
the SEM feature. On the other hand, the fractured surface of the specimen prepared
with the non silane treated filler showed that the silica-fillers are separated from the
resin matrix.
4. The strength of the composite resin containing 12% ethyleneglycol dimethacrylate
(EGDMA) in the matrix phase was greatest (p < 0.01), and the variation of the
EGDMA concentration was negatively correlated with the compressive strength
(r=0.3993, p<0.05).
5. The thermal expansion coefficients of the specimens were decreased as the
EGDMA concentration in the matrix phase increases form 12% to 29%, and the thermal
expansion coefficient of the resin was well matched with that of the tooth structure
When the EGDMA concentration in the matrix phase is 29%.

Å°¿öµå

¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸

 

µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸

KCI